As you will note above, using an extra light (and knowing where to position it) is a skill within itself. The first few attempts were awful, so its a good job I enjoy the process of photography, rather than just expecting great pictures to appear from thin air. Still, with the shots below, you'll see I was definitely getting somewhere.
Again, understanding where the light was going to fall was key to using the off-camera flash. Here the highlights are too harsh on the washing machines and there is an awkward shadow on the subject's face. There is also a lot of clutter in the bottom right, and the subject looks like he's waiting for the whole ordeal to be over. Never good. |
There is something about the halo effect of the one on the left above. Kind of a spiritual effect, almost like the second coming had turned up at launderette in Levenshulme.
Again, I've only really just noticed this one and thought it worthy of an edit for the benefit of my blog. I like it a lot, but alas it is too similar to the one of my chosen ones, only the subject here is placed on the opposite side.
Two days after my visit to Quick 'n' Spick, on a Thursday, I took the day off college to visit the Moor Top Launderette to say hello to Janet again. I was full of high hopes because of what Janet had told me about people using the as a drop-in centre, but I found this did not detract from the fact that the place was cramped with little room to manoeuvre and get what I wanted. Plus, I think my mood left a lot to be desired on this day, so I probably didn't communicate as effectively as I would have liked.
|
The ladies above were two got talking t as soon as I entered the place, for Janet was busy with something else. The conversation felt forced, and I felt claustrophobic in this environment. I just didn't feel as "in control" as I did in Levenshulme, and I think this had an impact on what I was shooting. This being said, it may well have been my high expectations of Moor Top, or the fact I was on a high after the results I'd got from Quick 'n' Spick.
In the above two examples I attempted something different I had not tried in Levenshulme: I wanted to capture the woman's face perfectly still, but with the washing spinning in the background. This required a slow shutter speed, but it didn't matter anyway, for the woman in the background ruined it by walking behind her. This just about summed-up the whole day. In the end I came away one that I would later use in my final ten, along with the outside of the building, which actually looks quite good (both are below).
f7.1, 1/125th, ISO100, 24mm (off-camera flash positioned directly in front of the subject, so the light fell on the right side of her face). Editing: Levels to brighten the midtones; Brightness/Contrast layer with a black mask to bring out the detail in the cardigan and bag; Gradient Map. The Print: Too harsh a contrast between blacks and whites, and detail lost in the cardigan despite edits. Could have got her to take her cardigan off. I like this image; its just not as good as some of the best from the set. I seem to keep changing my mind about it: sometimes I marvel at the facial expression and authoritative way she's sat (she used to be a teacher, and tried her utmost in convincing me to become one); other times all I see is the clutter (bag, knickers, bin bags in the background) and the fact the door is open when- in Richard's view- it would be better had it been shut. What I do like is the "dry cleaning" sign on the window, in the way it informs the viewer exactly of our setting, and the way the light falls diagonally just below this.
|
2) When I say official, I mean ones that I actually edited from the off and put on my Facebook page and the college group for feedback. In other words, I liked it from the off, but it just didn't make it into the final ten. Not bad considering I take a hundred or more every time I go out.